10 According to the grace of God which was given to me, as a wise master builder I have laid the foundation, and another builds on it. But let each one take heed how he builds on it.
11 For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.
12 Now if anyone builds on this foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw,
13 each one's work will become clear; for the Day will declare it, because it will be revealed by fire; and the fire will test each one's work, of what sort it is.
America’s founders did not want Congress to establish a national church, and many opposed establishments at the state level as well. Yet they believed, as George Washington declared in his Farewell Address, that of “all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports.” Moreover, almost without exception they agreed civic authorities could promote and encourage religion, and that it was appropriate for elected officials to make religious arguments in the public square.
While there have been some who have decried the very existence of a commission to study ways to reinforce religious liberty, even going so far to say that it is devoted to promoting what is known these days as "Christian nationalism," Hall has been an outspoken critic of this negative characterization of Christians who want to live out their faith publicly. In an interview piece at the website, Christ Over All, he states, regarding the term:
In 2006, it began to be used by critics who said, “Oh my goodness, there are these theocrats out there that want to take over America for Christ and oppress racial minorities and women. And maybe only Protestants will be put on the very top. This is horrible. It’s scary. We should be very, very afraid.” It’s an extension of the literature criticizing the religious right of the 90s and early twenty-first century. So beginning in 2006, almost every other year a book would come out. Most of them were polemical authors saying we should be very, very, very afraid.
I would say, look, conservative Christians should simply reject that label and say: We are Christians. We are followers of Christ. We have an obligation to be salt and light in the city and we are going to be politically active and we are going to make the arguments that we want to make. And if we want to make biblical arguments, we’ll make them. And certainly, there’s nothing constitutionally to prohibit us from doing so. But perhaps if we’re trying to reach people besides Christians. We might make moral arguments, arguments based on social science, arguments that we think will be effective.
In a piece published by the Centennial Institute at Colorado Christian University, Hall wrote: "By the founding era, virtually every civic leader embraced the view that religious liberty should be robustly protected. The United States Constitution specifically banned religious tests for federal office, and its oath provisions included a religious accommodation to permit Quakers and others who have religious objections to swearing oaths to affirm them instead." He related that at the conclusion of what he terms the "Revolutionary era," each state protect religious liberty in a "significant way." He went on to say, "The federal Constitution of 1787 did not, but only because its supporters believed the national government did not have the delegated power to pass laws interfering with religious belief or practice. In the face of popular outcry, the first Congress proposed and the states ratified a constitutional amendment stating that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof … ”
There are excellent reasons for Christians to reject both what the critics call Christian nationalism and what its proponents call Christian nationalism. Instead, Christian should be patriotic, and we must bring our faith into the public square to advocate for liberty, justice, and equality for all. We cannot let critics shame us into privatizing our faith and abandoning our responsibility to “seek the peace and prosperity of the city” (Jeremiah 29:7).
There is a role for the Christian in upholding religious liberty, not only for ourselves, but for other faith groups who wish to operate, in a legitimate and lawful manner, according to their faith. Are there limits? I believe so - we should not act in an irresponsible manner and attempt to place a faith stamp on bad behavior. We can recognize that reliance on a higher power, whom we recognize as God our Father, His Son, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit, can be incredibly beneficial, even in a society that has shown signs of rejecting God. We should know our history and practice our faith vibrantly.
And, we should not back down from loving our country - but we should always be careful to love God first. Our country consists on principles and people - principles, many of which are consistent with Scripture. And, people, those who we are called to love, our fellow citizens, our "neighbors." We have been brought together for this time for divine purposes, and we are called to live out our faith in God so that we can have a better, more cohesive country - but we have to be unified by something, and it can and should be moral and spiritual in nature.