2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan.
3 Whoever loves wisdom makes his father rejoice, But a companion of harlots wastes his wealth.
4 The king establishes the land by justice, But he who receives bribes overthrows it.
OK, public officials decided that a church in Dillon, Colorado that had been holding Sunday services at a local amphitheater could no longer use the facility. You know, separation of church and state. So, by denying this usage, the church's First Amendment rights have been violated. Why create a crisis when there may not have been one in the first place?
CBS News reported on its website:
For years, the Dillon Community Church held Sunday services at the Dillon Amphitheater, but the legality of the practice is being questioned.
The town's now-former attorney Kathleen Kelly advised Dillon Town Council to change its policy regarding the church to avoid violating freedom of religion protections. The council initially ignored this advice but has since reversed course, now halting the church services and looking into a new policy for amphitheater use among nonprofits.
Of course, you don't have to look very far to see the Freedom from Religion Foundation attempting to pull some strings. The article notes:
The Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to the town, highlighting its vulnerability to lawsuits if the church truly is being given special treatment compared to other nonprofits. The FFRF argues that other nonprofit groups should have the chance to rent the amphitheater and that the church should pay the same rental rate, if there is a cost at all.
Back in April, Kelly and Dillon events and recreation director Jessie Klehfoth brought this to the Town Council’s attention, suggesting that the town formalize a policy for religious, political and other outside groups looking to rent the amphitheater. Klehfoth at the time said the amphitheater has grown to be “widely popular” and that many different religious, political and private groups have asked to use the space.
The council rejected a "draft proposal" that would have limited use of the facility to events that are sponsored by the town. After initially voting to continue to allow the church to use the amphitheater, it reversed course and decided that while this new policy was being drafted, there would be no further rentals.
Citizens gathered in a council meeting to voice their opinion; the article notes that, "At least one public speaker noted that another legal group, the First Liberty Institute, had sent a letter to the Town Council, opining that the decision to allow the church to use the amphitheater doesn’t violate the First Amendment."
No comments:
Post a Comment